Is It Just To Allow People to Go to Hell? (Part 1)

Perhaps the most disliked doctrine by modern man is the idea of people going to hell forever. The idea tends to promote several questions:

How can a good and loving God torture people in hell?
Why cannot God merely forgive people?
How can it be fair for people to suffer forever for a temporal sin?
Why not reform people and allow them into heaven?
Why did God create people He knew would go to hell?
Why not annihilate sinners instead of sending them to hell?

There are others, but these are representative of the common objections. Since these are too many questions for a single post, we will deal with these over several posts.

We must first recognize that the existence or non-existence of hell is not dependent on our desires. Just like the existence or non-existence of God does not depend on whether or not I want Him to exist, the existence of hell is not determined by whether or not I think it is fair. If it were up for a vote, I probably would not vote for hell. Frankly, the idea sounds repugnant to me. But we must realize that we do not determine things by feelings, especially the feelings of a finite, sinful human, as we all are. Instead we must consider logic, reason, and God’s revelation to determine what is the truth. We do not determine truth by wishful thinking, whether it be the existence of God, hell, or anything else.

We must also be careful to consider what the Bible says about hell, and not what we might imagine it says. As with anything, it is important to go to the original source and see what is actually taught, not what others have quoted or suggested. In the scholarly world, writers do not consider secondary quotes as reliable, and the same should apply with the Bible. We should carefully examine what the original source teaches. In the case of hell, the New Testament in general and Jesus in particular have a great deal to say about hell. For example, critics of Christianity often present a stereotyped view of the Old Testament as mean and cruel, and the Jesus in the New Testament as loving and merciful. The truth is actually rather surprising (as you can see here).

We must also realize that whether or not we personally agree with the concept of hell, the Bible is clear in that it teaches the existence of hell. At the end of the day, we can reject the entire concept, but we must realize that if we do so we are flatly disagreeing with what the Bible clearly teaches. For example, hell is taught in passages such as Matthew 13:40-41, 49-50; 22:13; 23:15, 33; 25:41; and many more. For a good account, and a good start to this series on hell, I suggest you read Luke 16.

So it will take a few posts to answer most of the issues, so you might want to hold off a bit with the criticisms until we are well on the way through the explanations.


About humblesmith

Christian Apologist & Philosopher
This entry was posted in Bible, Theology. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Is It Just To Allow People to Go to Hell? (Part 1)

  1. thoughtofvg says:

    This should be interesting-i’m looking forward to the next few posts.

  2. The idea of hell is repugnant to you because you are a human being, endowed with empathy, compassion and a score of other cooperative mannerisms afforded to us by the natural process of evolution.

    I find it disturbing that you choose to overlook these natural, healthy and productive inhibitions and espouse the concept of the Christian hell, which ultimately is argued from faith and first principles.

    It always surprises me that Christians fight so hard to relinquish down their innate humanity, only to compose it back again, piecemeal and incomplete, around a mythology.

    Just for a moment – as brief as you like – consider how many of your internal philosophical struggles and problems would become irrelevant if you converted to another religion, or gave it up altogether.

    The title of the post is a question. Outside of your view point, it has a very simple answer. But you cannot answer it simply because you are constrained by faith-based first principles. You should critically examine the question and ask: who is doing the “allowing” and whose “justice” are you referring to?

    To an outsider, like me, I see someone who is trying to square their own natural internal code of justice (compassion, empathy – yes, imperfect and confusing, but functional) with Christianity’s definition of “justice”, as evidenced by actions of a deity in a myth.

    Don’t short change yourself. You have all that you need to deal with the quarrels and toils of this world inside you, without an ancient text. You’re not guaranteed a good life, or fair, or long. But what you will have is authentic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s