Was Jesus Begotten?

Some religious groups that deny the doctrine of the Trinity include the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the United Pentecostal Church. These groups have been declared as being outside of Christianity due to their essentially non-Christian teachings. Christianity has always held to the Trinity and salvation by grace through faith, not of works. All who have ever denied the Trinity end up having some degree of good works which are needed for salvation. Further, denying the essential nature of God and creating another definition different from the scriptures is idolatry, and falls outside of Christianity.

One point that these heretical groups make is concerning the Bible passages that speak of Jesus as ‘only begotten Son.’ The following is an example is from The Oneness of God, by oneness pentecostal David Bernard:

John 3:16 calls Jesus the only begotten Son of God. . . The word begotten is a form of the verb beget, which means ‘to procreate, to father, to sire.’ Thus begotten indicates a definite point in time — the point at which conception takes place. By definition, the begetter (father) always must come before the begotten (offspring). There must be a time when the begetter exists and the begotten is not yet in existence, and there must be a point in time when the act of begetting occurs. Otherwise the word begotten has no meaning. So, the very words begotten and Son each contradict the word eternal as applied to the Son of God. (p.103-104)

 The reasoning above has been given to me by Jehovah’s Witnesses as well. If this line of thinking is correct, then mainline Christianity has been a false teacher for many centuries, because we teach that Jesus is God the Son, and that the Son has existed eternally as the Son. We believe that Jesus is not the Father, but has lived in eternal relation in the Trinity, as one God, of three persons. The councils of Nicea (325 AD) and Chalcedon (451 AD) defined this doctrine.

However, the reasoning in the quote is incorrect. The confusion happens because these people have not carefully done their homework in regards to the meaning of the words.

In English, begotten and only begotten are quite similar. But the New Testament was not written in English, but in koine Greek. In Greek, the two terms are different words with different meanings. The word translated ‘begotten’ in our New Testament is geneo (strongs 1080), which means ‘to give birth to; to become the parent of.’ By contrast, the word translated ‘only begotten’ is monogenes (strongs 3439). It means “the only one of its kind; one and only; unique.” Any good Greek lexicon, such as BDAG, will give this information.

Thus a simple bit of language research could have prevented a heretical view of Christ. In any case, the Biblical teaching is clear: Jesus has existed eternally as the second person of the Trinity, and those who deny it are heretics that were, are, and will be outside of Christianity. All of the questions concerning the nature of Jesus were worked out in the early centuries of the church, and those who denied the orthodox position were cut off from the body of Christ. They will continue to be so.

Advertisements

About humblesmith

Christian Apologist & Philosopher
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Was Jesus Begotten?

  1. Kim says:

    As a oneness Pentecostal I would like to further explain our belief on the Godhead. We believe that Jesus Christ is the fullness of the Godhead bodily. We only believe in One God. Only one name is given by heaven in which we can be saved. We believe when the term begotten is used it is referring to the flesh that God spoke into existence… He is also reffered to as the second Adam. The flesh is the son and the Father term refers to the Spirit of God. To sum it up we are made in the image of God. As a human I’m one person My name is Kim I’m called Mom by my children daughter and I’m also someone s wife. But I’m only one person! With God nothing is impossible he has the ability to create his own flesh and dwell in it while being omnipresent.

    • humblesmith says:

      Kim:
      Thank you for your kind, polite response. Too often people online are not nearly as respectful as you.

      Regarding the term begotten, I think the quote I gave in the post is clear enough as to what this author was intending. He claims that the Son was begotten, not that the Son’s flesh was begotten. That is what my post was referring to. Certainly not everyone would teach the same as this one author.

      As to what Oneness Pentecostal’s believe regarding the Godhead, I realize there is more involved in Oneness teachings than the little bit presented here. The Oneness theology has been referred to as Modalism or with a few other more technical terms. It was first taught in a widespread way by a man named Sabellius in the early centuries of Christianity. Sabellius’s Oneness teachings were carefully evaluated and declared non-Christian in about 220 AD, and have been held this way ever since. In the first few hundred years of the church, the leaders dealt with every possible combination of explaining Jesus and the Father. For a list of all of these views and what was taught, see here: https://humblesmith.wordpress.com/2016/03/13/truth-and-heresy-about-christ/

      By contrast, Christianity has always taught the Trinity, even in the earliest years. For the references to this, see here: https://humblesmith.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/the-origins-of-the-doctrine-of-the-trinity/

      My blessings to you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s