Dead Sea Scrolls: Evidence For Accurate Copies Of The Bible

Prior to the 1940 – 1950 period, the earliest copies of the Old Testament were from around 900 A.D. The Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in the late 1940’s, but weren’t really investigated till the mid-1950’s, and the scholarly work continued for years.

One of the greatest discoveries in the Dead Sea Scrolls was a complete copy of Isaiah, one of the largest books in the Old Testament. Called “The Great Isaiah Scroll” because of it’s large size, scholars dated it to about 150 B.C.

So now we had a test. We had a copy of an Old Testament book which was dated a full 1000 years prior to the copies that had been used for many centuries. The scholars could compare the two versions and determine how accurately they were copied during the 1000 year period. Keep in mind that this was from 100 B.C. to 900 A.D., and all that was used was manual copying. The books were copied by hand for 1000 years. How accurate could the ancients be?

The book A General Introduction To The Bible by Geisler and Nix presents a good examination of the similarities and differences. They say the following:

Of the 166 Hebrew words in Isaiah 53 only seventeen Hebrew letters in QIsb differ from the Masoretic Text. Ten letters are a matter of spelling, four are stylistic changes, and the other three compose the word for “light” (add in v.11), which does not affect the meaning greatly. Furthermore that word is also found in that verse in the LXX and QIsa.
(Geisler and Nix, 382)

Keep in mind this was over a 1000 year period. By comparison, we have copies of the New Testament books far earlier. The earliest fragment of the New Testament is the John Rylands fragment, dated to between 20 and 50 years from the original. If scribes can copy the Old Testament accurately for 1000 years, they can copy the New Testament  over one generation.

Therefore we can rest assured that the Bible has been copied accurately since it was revealed to us by God.

About humblesmith

Christian Apologist & Philosopher
This entry was posted in Apologetics, Bible. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Dead Sea Scrolls: Evidence For Accurate Copies Of The Bible

  1. Arkenaten says:

    Ever considered the Essenes? They were on the lookout for a Messiah. They were around before Jesus’s supposed ministry and after his crucifixion, yet in all their writings not a single peep about Jesus, Not even an allusion.
    Makes you wonder, does it not?

    • humblesmith says:

      Scholars are divided on what the Essenes actually believed. They know a few things from the Dead Sea Scrolls, but not everything. But your comment reveals more sophistry than argument. Even if we grant that the Essenes missed Jesus, this does not prove anything whatsoever about whether or not Jesus lived or whether He was truly the Messiah. The Jews lived and talked with Jesus, yet denied He is the Messiah, and wrote very little about Him.

      Some scholars hold that some of the fragments found in the Dead Sea Scrolls were from the gospel of Mark, but this is unproven.

      Arguments from silence do not carry much weight, except in persuasion techniques. By contrast, Christianity follows a logical and reasonable path.

      Further, this comment ignores the topic of the post. Makes you wonder.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s